9 Best ProWritingAid Alternatives for Authors (Free + Paid 2026)

ProWritingAid is still one of the deepest writing tools on the market, but it isn't the right fit for every author — the daily Sparks cap, the tightened free plan, the euro-default pricing, the steep Lifetime price, and the renewal that often comes in higher than the new-customer rate all push some writers to look elsewhere. Most "alternatives" lists dump fifteen tools into a table without telling you which ones are real depth alternatives versus grammar checkers being marketed as alternatives. This one segments by job and the actual cheap fix most posts skip is not switching — it's tightening how you use PWA.

Quick answer: The best ProWritingAid alternatives for authors in 2026 are AutoCrit (fiction, $180/yr), Grammarly Pro ($144/yr), LanguageTool Premium ($59.90/yr — cheapest), Hemingway Editor Plus ($100/yr), and Fictionary StoryTeller ($168/yr for story structure). For deep manuscript analysis: Marlowe by Authors AI ($159/yr for 48 reports). Free combo: LanguageTool Free + Hemingway Free ($0). The fix most posts skip: cancel PWA, take the win-back discount, and resubscribe at ~50% off.

The 9 alternatives at a glance

Tool	Best for	Free plan	Cheapest paid	Manuscript depth
Grammarly Pro	Cross-app writing, nonfiction	Yes (good)	$144/yr	No
Hemingway Editor	Readability, conciseness	Yes (web)	$100/yr (Plus)	No
LanguageTool	Multilingual writers, ESL	Yes (good)	$59.90/yr (Premium)	No
AutoCrit	Fiction-specific revision	Limited	$180/yr (Pro)	Yes (genre-benchmarked)
Fictionary StoryTeller	Story structure for novelists	Trial only	$168/yr	Yes (story-level)
Marlowe (Authors AI)	AI manuscript analysis	Free Basic	$159/yr (48 reports)	Yes (vs published corpus)
WordRake	Concision, legal/business prose	Trial only	$129/yr	No
QuillBot	AI paraphrasing	Yes (limited)	$99.95/yr	No
Ginger	Non-native English writers	Yes	~$90/yr	No

What's in this guide

• Why authors leave ProWritingAid in 2026
• Before switching: downgrade instead of leaving
• True depth alternatives vs grammar-only alternatives
• The 9 alternatives in detail
• Three-year cost compared
• Migration friction: what you lose when you leave PWA
• Which alternative fits you (decision tree)
• FAQ

---

Why authors leave ProWritingAid in 2026

Most "ProWritingAid alternatives" posts don't say why authors switch in the first place. The honest list, gathered from indie author forums (r/selfpublish, r/writing), Trustpilot reviews, and the friction we hear about from authors we work with:

• The free plan got tighter. Document checks are now capped at 500 words per check, and Sparks (PWA's AI assistant) caps at 3/day on free. Fine for evaluation. Useless for manuscript work.
• Sparks daily caps on paid plans hurt mid-revision. Premium gets 5 Sparks/day, Premium Pro gets 50. The working pattern most authors land on: use PWA Sparks for in-context scene rewrites (where the report data matters), and rotate to ChatGPT or Claude for bulk brainstorming — they're cheaper per request than upgrading to Premium Pro for the 50/day cap.
• Long manuscripts slow the editor down. Documents over ~10,000 words start to drag, especially with multiple reports running. Authors with 90k-100k novels split files chapter-by-chapter to compensate.
• The Scrivener integration has limits. It runs one document at a time, not a compiled project, and Track Changes does not always survive the round-trip. Series authors with custom-dictionary character names report glitches after project moves.
• No Google Docs comment-thread integration, no Android-native app, no real mobile experience. If your draft workflow lives outside Word and Scrivener, PWA is harder to use than it should be.
• The Lifetime price climbed. €399 for Premium Lifetime, €699 for Premium Pro Lifetime. Both still offered in 2026. Breakeven against annual is now year 3.3.
• Pricing defaults to EUR, and renewals come in higher than new-customer rates. This is the friction point most posts miss: PWA's auto-renewal often costs more than a brand-new annual subscription. The fix — cancel, wait for the win-back email, resubscribe at ~50% off — is the actual cheap move. More on that in the next section.
• The 25+ reports are overwhelming. This is the most common complaint and the most contradictory: PWA's depth is the reason to use it, and it's also the reason new users feel paralyzed. The real fix is to ignore 20 of the 25 reports — which most authors never try.

If you recognize one or two of these, you don't need to leave PWA. If you recognize four or more, an alternative will probably serve you better.

Before switching: downgrade instead of leaving

The most common pattern with PWA users considering alternatives is that they think they need to switch when they actually need to use PWA differently. Two tactics that beat switching:

Use 4 reports, not 25+

Almost every fiction author who uses PWA effectively settles on the same short list of reports. The other 20 reports are noise.

• Echoes — flags repeated words within proximity. The single highest-value report for fiction.
• Sticky Sentences — flags sentences over-loaded with "glue" words ("of," "the," "and"). Catches the prose lag that beta readers can't name.
• Pacing — measures sentence-length variance across a chapter. Action scenes should average shorter sentences; quiet scenes longer.
• Repeats — flags overused signature words and phrases (your tic words).

Open one report at a time, work through it, close it, open the next. Don't run the all-reports view — that's what generates the "overwhelming" feeling.

For nonfiction writers, the short list is different: Readability, Sticky Sentences, Style (passive voice and weak verbs), and Transitions.

Cancel and take the win-back discount

PWA's auto-renewal often comes in higher than the new-customer Annual price. The fix: cancel before renewal, wait 2-4 weeks for the win-back email (typically 40-50% off), and resubscribe at that rate. Authors on KBoards and r/selfpublish report this works reliably as of May 2026. It's the cheapest path to keeping PWA — about €60-€70/year (~$65-$75) instead of €120 — and beats every paid alternative on this list except LanguageTool.

If you've tried both of these and you still want to switch, the rest of this guide is for you.

True depth alternatives vs grammar-only alternatives

This is the segmentation most other lists skip. ProWritingAid is doing two different jobs (grammar checking + 25+ manuscript reports), and most alternatives only replace one.

Real depth alternatives (tools that analyze at a level beyond sentence grammar):

• AutoCrit — genre-benchmarked fiction reports (pacing, dialogue, repetition vs bestsellers in your genre). The closest analog to PWA's report suite for fiction.
• Fictionary StoryTeller — story-structure analysis (scene purpose, character arc, plot beats). A different angle from PWA — closer to a developmental editor than a copy editor.
• Marlowe (Authors AI) — AI analysis of your manuscript against a corpus of published novels. Reports on readability, pacing, characters, dialogue ratio, narrative arc. Closer to a literary diagnostic than a copy editor.

Grammar-checker alternatives (good tools, but they replace different parts of PWA):

• Grammarly Pro — better sentence-level grammar and cross-app coverage, no manuscript reports.
• LanguageTool — strong multilingual grammar checker, no manuscript reports.
• Hemingway — readability and concision, no manuscript reports.
• WordRake — single-purpose tightening of prose, no manuscript reports.
• QuillBot — rewriting and paraphrasing, no manuscript reports.
• Ginger — grammar plus translation for ESL writers, no manuscript reports.

If you switched to PWA for the reports and you're considering leaving, evaluate the depth alternatives. If you switched for grammar checking and find PWA more than you need, the grammar-checker tools cover that job at lower cost.

The 9 alternatives in detail

1. Grammarly Pro — best for cross-app coverage and nonfiction

2026 pricing: Free, Pro Monthly $30/mo, Pro Quarterly $20/mo, Pro Annual $12/mo ($144/yr), Business $15/seat/mo (min 3 seats).

Grammarly is the alternative most PWA users end up with — not because it's a deeper editing tool (it isn't) but because it covers writing surfaces PWA doesn't reach. Browser extension across every site, native Word add-in, Google Docs integration, mobile keyboard on iOS and Android, desktop apps for Windows and Mac. If your writing day moves between Gmail, Substack, Slack, KDP back-end, blog editor, and Word, Grammarly's coverage is wider than any other tool here.

The 2024 plan name "Grammarly Premium" was renamed Grammarly Pro in 2025. The AI assistant inside Grammarly was previously branded GrammarlyGO and is now part of the Superhuman Go umbrella after Grammarly's parent company rebranded to Superhuman (TechCrunch, October 2025).

Strengths: Cross-app coverage, mobile keyboard, plagiarism included with Pro, faster than PWA on long documents, AI assistant works in every app the extension supports.

Limitations for fiction: Flags intentional fragments, italicized internal monologue, and creative punctuation as errors. No manuscript-level reports. Treats craft choices as mistakes.

Best for: Nonfiction writers, newsletter authors, bloggers, mixed-mode career authors who write more marketing copy than fiction. For the full head-to-head with 3-year cost math, see ProWritingAid vs Grammarly for Authors.

2. Hemingway Editor — best for readability and conciseness

2026 pricing: Free (web editor), Hemingway Plus $10/mo or $100/yr (5,000 AI sentences), Plus higher tier $15/mo (10,000 sentences).

Hemingway was free-only for years; in 2024-2025 it added a paid AI tier. The core product still works in your browser at no cost. Paste your text in, and Hemingway color-codes it: yellow for hard-to-read sentences, red for very hard, blue for adverbs, green for passive voice, purple for fancy words with simpler alternatives.

Strengths: The clearest single-purpose tool on this list. Fast. Free for the core feature set. Forces you to write in the active voice and short sentences. No friction. No 25-tab dashboard.

Limitations: Single-document only (no Scrivener, no Word add-in, no project-level analysis). The "readability grade" target it pushes (grade 9 or lower) is great for blog posts and disastrous for literary fiction — Hemingway will flag your beautifully complex sentences as wrong.

Best for: Nonfiction writers, bloggers, business writers, anyone whose problem is "my sentences are too long." Not for fiction.

3. LanguageTool — best free open-source alternative for multilingual writers

2026 pricing: Free (good), Premium $19.90/mo or $59.90/yr (~$5/mo).

LanguageTool is the strongest free alternative for English grammar checking, and the strongest paid alternative for writers working in multiple languages (30+ supported, including German, Spanish, French, Italian, Portuguese, Dutch, Polish, Russian). The free plan is genuinely useful — unlike PWA's tightened 500-word cap — and Premium is cheaper than any other paid grammar checker on this list.

Strengths: 30+ languages with native-level grammar rules. Free plan is usable for daily writing. Premium at $59.90/yr is the cheapest paid alternative here. Self-hostable open-source version for privacy-conscious writers. Works in browser, Word, Google Docs.

Limitations: No manuscript-level reports. The AI rewriting features are weaker than Grammarly's. Smaller integration list. The interface is functional, not polished.

Best for: ESL writers, multilingual writers, authors writing in non-English markets, anyone on a tight budget. For German and Spanish indie authors specifically, this is the right default.

4. AutoCrit — best fiction-specific alternative

2026 pricing: Free (limited), Pro Monthly $30/mo, Pro Annual $180/yr ($15/mo).

AutoCrit is the closest analog to PWA for fiction-specific revision. The differentiator: genre benchmarking. You tell AutoCrit your manuscript is romance, thriller, fantasy, mystery, or literary fiction, and it analyzes your pacing, dialogue, word choice, and sentence structure against published bestsellers in that genre. PWA's reports are genre-neutral; AutoCrit's are not.

Strengths: Genre-benchmarked reports — uniquely useful for indie authors writing to market. Stronger fiction-craft focus than PWA. Slightly faster on long manuscripts.

Limitations: Fewer reports than PWA's 25+ (AutoCrit focuses on a tighter fiction-craft set). No native Scrivener integration — if you write in Scrivener, the workflow is compile-to-Word and check there, adding the friction PWA's Scrivener integration was built to remove. No Lifetime option. No real free tier.

Best for: Indie fiction authors writing to market in commercial genres (romance, thriller, fantasy, cozy mystery — categories where conformity to reader expectations sells books). Authors who outgrew PWA's genre-neutral reports. One caveat: AutoCrit's published genres are broad but not exhaustive. Cozy mystery typically rolls into the broader Mystery category (directionally useful, not sub-genre tuned); litRPG and niche fiction styles get lumped into broader buckets. Use the free trial to confirm your specific genre is benchmarked before subscribing.

5. Fictionary StoryTeller — best for story structure

2026 pricing: StoryTeller Monthly $19/mo, Annual $168/yr ($14/mo).

Fictionary takes a different angle from PWA: it's not a grammar or prose tool, it's a story-structure tool. Upload your manuscript and Fictionary breaks it into scenes, then evaluates each scene against 38 story elements (scene goal, point of view, conflict, character arc movement, setting, time, scene purpose). Closer to a developmental editor than a copy editor.

Strengths: A genuinely unique angle. No other tool on this list does scene-level story-structure analysis. Strong fit for novelists revising structure before line-editing. Built specifically for fiction.

Limitations: Narrow product (story structure only, no grammar/style). Steep learning curve. Annual price is mid-tier without a Lifetime option. If you're not revising structure, you don't need it.

Best for: Fiction novelists doing developmental-revision passes before line edits. Pairs well with PWA or AutoCrit on the line-editing side rather than replacing them.

6. Marlowe (Authors AI) — best for AI manuscript analysis

2026 pricing: Free Basic, Pro single report $29.95, Monthly $19.95 (4 reports/month), Annual $159/yr (48 reports).

Marlowe is the manuscript-analysis tool from Authors AI. Upload a full novel (20,000-word minimum) and Marlowe returns a multi-page diagnostic: readability, pacing, dialogue ratio, narrative arc, character mentions, comparable published novels, and a list of issues to consider. Reports run against a corpus of published novels, so the comparisons are calibrated against books that sold rather than against general writing. Reports typically return within a day depending on length and queue.

Strengths: Full-manuscript analysis (no chunking required), benchmarking against published-novel corpus, comp-title suggestions. Strong for a one-shot diagnostic before submitting to agents or before a publishing decision. (If you need a marketing-layer report to go with the diagnostic — blurb, ten comp titles, KDP categories, audience profile, ad copy — that's where ManuscriptReport's Book Marketing Report extends the workflow.)

Limitations: Not a real-time editing tool — you upload and wait rather than editing in the tool. 20k-word minimum rules out short works. No integration with Scrivener, Word, or browser. Reports are descriptive ("here's what your manuscript looks like") more than prescriptive ("here's what to change").

Best for: Authors finishing a manuscript who want a diagnostic before they query agents, hire an editor, or pick a publishing path. Authors doing comp-title research. Not for active line-editing.

7. WordRake — best for concision

2026 pricing: Word only $129/yr, Word + Outlook $199/yr. Trial only on free.

WordRake is the most single-purpose tool on this list: it removes unnecessary words. Click "Rake" inside Microsoft Word, and WordRake strikes through every phrase it considers padding — "in order to" becomes "to," "due to the fact that" becomes "because." Not a grammar checker, not a style tool, not an AI rewriter. A concision tool.

Strengths: Single-purpose tools do their one job well. Popular with lawyers, business writers, consultants. Fast. Predictable. Cheaper than Grammarly Pro.

Limitations: Microsoft Word only (no Scrivener, no browser, no mobile). No grammar checking. No spell-check. No fiction-specific features. The concision rules are aggressive — fiction writers will reject most of the suggestions because rhythm matters more than economy in dialogue and scene-setting.

Best for: Nonfiction writers, business writers, lawyers, consultants, academics. Fiction authors will get more annoyed than helped.

8. QuillBot — best for AI paraphrasing

2026 pricing: Free (limited rewrites), Premium Monthly $19.95/mo, Annual $99.95/yr ($8.33/mo).

QuillBot started as a paraphrasing tool and expanded into a broader writing suite. The core feature — feed it a sentence, get back rewrites in different tones (formal, casual, fluent, creative, shorten, expand) — works well and faster than asking ChatGPT for the same job. The expanded suite includes a grammar checker, plagiarism checker, summarizer, and citation generator.

Strengths: Fast paraphrasing. Good for breaking writer's block on a sentence or paragraph. Cheaper than Grammarly Pro. Integrates with Word and browser. Strong free tier.

Limitations: The grammar checker is weaker than Grammarly's or LanguageTool's. The paraphrasing tool can over-rewrite and produce awkward English if you trust it too much. Not built for fiction (paraphrased dialogue loses voice).

Best for: Nonfiction writers and content creators who paraphrase frequently. Students. ESL writers learning English idioms. Not for fiction authors who care about voice.

9. Ginger — best for non-native English speakers

2026 pricing: Free (basic), Premium Monthly $20.97/mo, Annual $90/yr ($7.49/mo).

Ginger is built for non-native English speakers. The differentiating features are sentence rephrasing, text-to-speech (hear how a sentence sounds), translation (40+ languages), and a personal trainer that tracks recurring mistakes. The grammar checker is solid but not as deep as Grammarly's.

Strengths: ESL-specific features no other tool here combines. Translation and TTS are unique. Cheap annual plan. Browser extension and Word add-in.

Limitations: Smaller integration list than Grammarly. Translation quality varies by language. Not for native English writers — you're paying for features you don't need.

Best for: ESL writers, non-native English-speaking authors writing for English-language markets, writers translating their own work between languages.

Three-year cost compared

The number that matters if you'll use one of these through your next two or three books. Costs in USD or USD-equivalent.

Tool	Year 1	Year 2	Year 3	3-year total
ProWritingAid Premium Lifetime	~$430 (€399)	$0	$0	~$430 (then $0 forever)
ProWritingAid Premium Annual	~$130	~$130	~$130	~$390
PWA cancel-and-rejoin at win-back rate	~$65	~$65	~$65	~$195
LanguageTool Premium	$59.90	$59.90	$59.90	~$180
Ginger Premium	~$90	~$90	~$90	~$270
QuillBot Premium	$99.95	$99.95	$99.95	~$300
Hemingway Plus	$100	$100	$100	~$300
WordRake Word Only	$129	$129	$129	~$390
Grammarly Pro	$144	$144	$144	~$430
Marlowe (48 reports)	$159	$159	$159	~$480
Fictionary StoryTeller	$168	$168	$168	~$504
AutoCrit Pro	$180	$180	$180	~$540
Free combo (LanguageTool Free + Hemingway Free)	$0	$0	$0	$0

The single best value over three years is the PWA cancel-and-rejoin tactic at ~$195 (when the win-back discount holds). After that, LanguageTool Premium at ~$180 for paid grammar checking across 30+ languages. The single best value if you'll stay with PWA long term is Premium Lifetime at €399 once — but only if you'll still be using the tool in 2029 and beyond. The free combo (LanguageTool Free + Hemingway Free) is a real workflow for budget-tight authors, covering grammar and readability for $0.

Migration friction: what you lose when you leave PWA

Switching tools isn't free. The honest list of what doesn't survive the move:

• Scrivener integration is unique to PWA. No other tool here integrates natively with Scrivener. Your options after switching: compile to Word and check there (Grammarly, AutoCrit, LanguageTool), or copy-paste sections (Hemingway, QuillBot). Both create friction PWA's Scrivener integration was built to remove.
• The 25+ report suite. Only AutoCrit and Fictionary have comparable depth, and they're optimized for fiction. Nonfiction writers leaving PWA lose the deep style/repetition/pacing reports without a single-tool replacement.
• Your custom dictionary. Most tools let you import a word list, but the per-document personal dictionary you've built over years (character names, fantasy terminology, brand vocabulary) doesn't transfer automatically. The realistic move: export your PWA dictionary to a text file, then re-import into the new tool's word list. Series authors with 8+ books of consistent names should budget an hour for this.
• Style guide / house style enforcement. PWA's House Style feature is uncommon. WordRake has a similar idea for concision only. Most alternatives don't have this.
• The Critique feature (Premium Pro). Chapter-level fiction critique with AI is rare in this list. Marlowe is the closest, but it's a one-shot report rather than an iterative critique tool.
• Plagiarism on demand. PWA sells plagiarism as report packs; Grammarly Pro includes it; other tools mostly don't. Most fiction authors don't need this — it's a Grammarly value point that matters more to academics, ghostwriters, and content marketers than to novelists.

If you depend on three or more of the above, consider whether tightening your PWA workflow (downgrade tactics above) beats switching.

Which alternative fits you (decision tree)

Use this if you've read the migration friction section and you still want to switch.

• You write in Scrivener → Stay with ProWritingAid (use the cancel-and-rejoin tactic to lower the price). The native Scrivener integration is unique. AutoCrit is the second-best fit but requires compile-and-check.
• You write to-market commercial fiction (romance, thriller, fantasy, cozy mystery, urban fantasy, litRPG) → AutoCrit Pro for genre-benchmarked line-editing, optionally paired with Fictionary StoryTeller for structural revision and Marlowe for a one-shot diagnostic before launch.
• You write literary or character-driven fiction → AutoCrit (ignore the genre benchmarks) or stay with PWA — its genre-neutral reports fit literary fiction better than AutoCrit's bestseller benchmarks.
• You write nonfiction, business, or academic → Grammarly Pro for cross-app coverage, or Hemingway Plus + LanguageTool Premium combo (~$160/yr) if you want to spend less.
• You write in a non-English market (German, Spanish, French, Portuguese, etc.) → LanguageTool Premium at $59.90/yr. Grammarly's strength doesn't extend to native-quality non-English checking; LanguageTool's does.
• You're an ESL writer writing for English-language markets → LanguageTool Premium as the primary tool, optionally Ginger for the translation and TTS features.
• You write Substack, newsletter, or content marketing → Grammarly Pro + Hemingway Free web tier. The combo handles grammar, tone, and readability across every surface.
• You're on a tight budget → LanguageTool Free + Hemingway Free for the editing layer ($0), then invest the saved budget in the marketing layer. See budget-friendly book marketing tips.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is there a free alternative to ProWritingAid?

Yes. LanguageTool Free is the strongest free grammar checker for English and 30+ other languages. Hemingway Editor's web version is free and handles readability and concision. Used together, they cover the grammar + readability layer at $0. Neither replaces PWA's 25+ manuscript reports — for that depth, no real free alternative exists. The lowest-paid path to depth is PWA cancel-and-rejoin at the win-back rate (~$65/yr).

What is the cheapest alternative to ProWritingAid?

LanguageTool Premium at $59.90/yr is the cheapest paid alternative. The cheapest path to keeping PWA itself is the cancel-and-rejoin tactic — let auto-renewal lapse, wait for the win-back discount email (typically 40-50% off), and resubscribe at that rate. Many authors keep their PWA Premium for around €60/year this way.

What is better than ProWritingAid in 2026?

It depends on what you used PWA for. For deep fiction reports, AutoCrit is the closest alternative (genre-benchmarked) and Fictionary StoryTeller adds story-structure analysis PWA doesn't have. For cross-app grammar checking, Grammarly Pro beats PWA's browser extension. For multilingual writing, LanguageTool Premium beats PWA at a quarter of the price. For one-shot manuscript diagnostics, Marlowe by Authors AI runs the analysis against a published-novel corpus.

Is ProWritingAid still good for novelists in 2026?

Yes, especially for novelists in literary, character-driven, or genre-neutral fiction. The 25+ reports remain the deepest line-editing toolset on the market, and the Scrivener integration is unique. The friction points (Sparks daily caps, tighter free plan, EUR-default pricing, slower performance on long documents) are real but mostly workflow-fixable — most novelists do better tightening their PWA usage (4 reports, not 25; cancel-and-rejoin pricing) than switching tools.

What's the best ProWritingAid alternative for fiction writers?

AutoCrit for line-editing with genre benchmarking (romance, thriller, fantasy, mystery). Fictionary StoryTeller for story-structure revision. Marlowe (Authors AI) for one-shot manuscript analysis against a published-novel corpus. None of the grammar-checker alternatives (Grammarly, LanguageTool, Hemingway) replace PWA for serious fiction work.

Does Grammarly work with Scrivener?

No. Grammarly has no native Scrivener integration. Scrivener users wanting to check their manuscript in Grammarly compile to Word or Google Docs and check there. This is the main reason Scrivener-based authors stay with ProWritingAid despite its other friction points.

Is the ProWritingAid Lifetime license worth it in 2026?

If you'll use PWA as your main editing tool through 2029 and beyond, yes — €399 Premium Lifetime breaks even against the €120/yr Premium Annual at year 3.3, then costs $0 forever. If your writing process is changing (going AI-first, switching genres, moving away from fiction), the Annual or the cancel-and-rejoin tactic is the safer commitment. The Premium Pro Lifetime at €699 is harder to justify unless you'll heavily use the daily Sparks and Critique features long term.

Is ProWritingAid better than Grammarly?

It depends on what you write. For long-form manuscripts and fiction, ProWritingAid wins on depth (25+ reports, Scrivener integration). For everyday writing across many apps (email, social, browser, mobile), Grammarly wins on coverage. The detailed head-to-head with 2026 pricing and three-year cost math is in ProWritingAid vs Grammarly for Authors.

---

Pricing verified May 2026 from each vendor's published pricing page. AI feature limits and pricing change frequently — confirm at checkout.